If you have a child, it becomes your responsibility, right? The child gets sick, needs care, whatever… You are responsible. What if something tragic happened to your sibling who has children – do their children become your responsibility? What if a neighbor’s child is suddenly in need? Is that your business? What if you hear of a child in your church that is desperately in need? A child in your city? Your region? Your country? Your world?
You see, somewhere in there, there is a line for all of us. Because, obviously, there are millions of starving, disease-infested children in this world that could really use a little bit of help.
We hem and haw and I think we generally have great intentions. We think things like, “If there was no one else to do it, then I would” and “If I could help everyone then I would but I am only one person”. Then we smile as we think that Bill Gates sure is doing a lot with his money (and we would too if we were him and really we helped him get that money when we bought Microsoft products so in a sense he is really just giving away our money for us which we sort of wanted him to do anyway).
But would we? Do we? Where does responsibility begin?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a24c7/a24c754d0ca27b2730e4d9e4dfa88b2bd2e489ca" alt=""
Strange isn’t it? Where does responsibility begin?
In reading that "Jesus for President" book you suggested, I was struck by Claiborne's connection of being Pro-Life with responsibility to local children. That being "ProLife" meant having skin in the game when a local 16 year old gets pregnant and can't support her baby...somehow stepping in to preserve life that does exist, not just protesting the concept of preventing life.
ReplyDelete